The fine line between cheating and helping is considered a cultural
shock. Depending on the perspective in
which is considered. For example, in the
United States, the act of helping another student during a test is considered
cheating, a bad thing. In contrast in
Puerto Rico there is a debate in whether helping is considered cheating a bad
thing or it is permissible under the educational standards as it can be
considered a means or alternative result in obtaining knowledge. What causes the cultural shock? Well, in the United
States students are taught to compete in all aspects of life. They are in a constant race to be best not
only at their class, but with others schools.
This indeed promotes a view that ‘helping ‘another student is bad,
therefore cheating or just a mean of using the easy way out. In Puerto Rico, helping others it is a principle
that is taught since childhood and it’s a part of our cultural background. Puerto Ricans cannot help themselves from
helping others especially when it comes to an exam. Students like to cheat, because they want their
friends to pass as much as they do.
Jim Cooper’s chapter eight “Helping” exposes the reality of students in
Puerto Rico ‘helping’ each other during exams, which he considered was
cheating. The problem he faced was that
he had no trouble with the students helping each other during class, but not
during exams. Coopers posture was that
an exam is an auto-evaluation that is strictly personal. But after a conversation with another
puertorican English teacher, who told him that he did not care if their
students cheat, because his main interest is that their students learn the right
answers to the questions. In other word
to obtain the knowledge he had intended for them. So that’s why cheating in Puerto Rican students
is not that of a bad thing.



